The story of Brownian motion began in 1827 with a Scottish botanist by the name of Robert Brown. Brown was investigating the fertilisation process in a new flowering plant when he noticed a ‘rapid oscillatory motion’ (pictured below) in the particles in pollen grains that were suspended in water. Other researchers had noticed this movement before, but Brown was the first to study it. This was a peculiar observation that Brown originally attributed to a characteristic of male sex cells of plants. However, when noticing that the same characteristic was present in plants that had been dead for over a century, it was obvious that his conclusion was not correct.
Further studies of this phenomenon led to this motion being observed in other solids, such as particles of smoke. One explanation was the convection currents of fluids, but this was quickly abandoned after it could not explain the uncorrelated behaviour of nearby particles. In 1877, it was observed that higher temperatures led to more chaotic Brownian motion. From this, it was suggested that the cause of the motion was linked to ‘thermal molecular motion in the liquid environment’. At the time, the existence of molecules and particles was an area of hot debate. This observation formed one of the building blocks of the kinetic theory of gases, a theory developed in the third quarter of the 19th century by the physicists James Clerk Maxwell, Ludwig Boltzmann and Rudolf Clausius as an explanation of heat phenomena. The theory described the temperature of a substance as proportional to the average kinetic energy the molecules in the substance exhibit.
In 1905, Albert Einstein (pictured on the right) published his doctoral dissertation on a statistical molecular theory of liquids. This was similar to Ludwig Boltzmann’s work from a few years before, however, Einstein was seemingly unaware of this. There were still many critics of Einstein’s work but when he published a second paper in 1908 that contained even further detail than his first one, it became clear that his theory seemed to work. His second paper detailed experiments that could be carried out to prove his theory and in the same year, a French physicist called Jean Baptiste Perrin undertook them. Perrin showed that Einstein’s paper, unsurprisingly, correctly predicted the exact movements of the motion that Brown had observed 80 years before. Perrin wrote that his results ‘cannot leave any doubt of the rigorous exactitude of the formula proposed by Einstein’ and he later earned a Nobel Prize for his work in 1926.
Eventually, the overwhelming amount of evidence proving Einstein’s statistical approach to molecular motion forced his theory to be excepted. This theory was then used in many other areas of science such as the behaviour of electromagnetic radiation, which was then adopted into the financial world due to its accurate description of random processes, such as the stock market. This is where Brownian motion’s story in finance begins and is what will be discussed further on this page.
Words or phrases that are underlined in this section will take you to more in-depth definitions of the financial terms.
Many of today’s most sophisticated mathematical models of financial systems can be traced back to Brownian motion. Einstein’s model of this motion is described by a probability distribution (similar to the various curves shown on the right) which gives the probability that a particle will end up in a certain position at a certain time. The time evolved probability that a particle will end up at a certain position is also well described by the heat equation, which states that the probability disperses just like heat in a material. The strength of the source and distribution of heat is analogous to the characteristics of the asset or stock that is modelled.
French mathematician Louis Bachelier had completed his PhD thesis that contained the majority of the mathematics that Einstein worked through in his 1908 paper. However, Bachelier’s paper focused on how the trends present in the stock market followed the random paths described by Brownian motion. The position probability follows the Bell curve (shown here on the left) which can be derived from the observed market data. This graph shows that the largest probability corresponds to the particle staying in the centre (where it started) and the next highest probability is small fluctuations. This is directly analogous to the price of a stock and the likelihood of the fluctuations to occur.
Two mathematicians, Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, came up with a model to describe the price of assets in the stock market. The equation for this model is similar to the heat equation and is built on Bachelier’s Brownian motion model but includes extra factors relating it to the stock market. Black and Scholes’ model holds financial assumptions, such as no transaction costs, no limits on short-selling (where an investor will buy stock shares at a certain price, sell them, and then buy them back at a lower price) and that it is possible to lend and borrow money on a fixed, risk-free, and known interest rate. This is known as arbitrage pricing theory; it follows the same mathematics as proposed by Bachelier. Its main assumption is that the market statistically behaves like Brownian motion where the drift and rate of volatility are constant. The drift is the movement of the mean price of the stock (related physically to the mean position of a particle) and the rate of volatility is the standard deviation, average distance from the mean, of the price of a stock (also related to the average distance from the mean position of a particle at a certain time). To find out more on the mathematics behind the equation, scroll to the bottom of this page.
Here is a video with a more in depth explanation of the Black-Scholes model, should you wish to understand the equation a lot more.
The main success of the Black and Scholes model is its ability to provide a sense of rationality when predicting the future price of a stock. Shown here on the right, is an animation showing how an arbitrary stock can be modelled when the drift and volatility are known. The equation has two solutions, one for a put option and one for a call option. A put option is a contract giving the investor the right to sell a stock for a certain price in the future. The investor hopes for the underlying price of the asset to decrease so that they can make a profit on this option. A call option is when an investor is given the right to buy a stock at a specified price within a certain period. In this case, the investor hopes that the price of the stock rises so that they can purchase the stock for a cheaper price than what it is currently valued. The Black-Scholes model provides a rational way for people to calculate the value of these options before they mature.
The statistical approach of Bachelier’s Brownian motion is not without its limitations. The Bell curve of probability shows the likelihood of a stock being that price at a given time. As can be seen from the bell curve shown next to the Bachelier model section, the likelihood that the stock price goes massively up or down is extremely unlikely. However, this does not align with our experience of the stock market, given the many financial crashes and booms over recent years, something that Bachelier’s model does not predict well. For example, stock in a company called Cisco Systems has undergone ten ‘5-sigma’ events in the last twenty years (sigma being the symbol for standard deviation, the average spread, so a 5-sigma event is when the stock price moves 5 times the average spread away from the mean price). However, Bachelier’s model predicts this price to have undergone 0.003 ‘5-sigma’ events in the same space of time. This distribution, along with the sigma variations is shown below.
These large variations have occurred numerous times throughout history and there are lots of examples of this. A clear example of the limitations of mathematical modelling in the financial world can be understood through a private hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management (LTCM). LTCM based their financial strategy on mathematical modelling, including the Black-Scholes model. Initially, the fund was successful and saw 40% growth per year for the first few years they set up. Eventually though, in 1998, the fund lost 4.6 billion US dollars in 4 months as a consequence of the Russian financial crash in 1998, occurring after LTCM and many other western corporations had invested heavily in Russia. The crash was caused by the Asian financial crash the previous year which had caused the price of oil to slump. Russia’s economy was heavily dependent on exports of oil, so the effects on Russia’s economy were significant.
One final and famous case that provides an anomaly to the Brownian motion model is Black Monday. This event occurred on the 19th of October 1987 where the world’s stock markets lost 20% of their market value in a few hours. Brownian motion predicts this violent fluctuation to be virtually impossible, a prediction many people presumably believed (and hoped for).
Overall, there are many limitations to using the Black-Scholes model that Brownian motion inspired. The mathematics works and rationally, should also therefore work in practice. However, a fact that repeats itself in history is uncovered in this practical application, the behaviour of people is not always rational when large sums of money are involved.
This section contains information on the equations that determine the prices of the stock. These are the same equations that are used when determining the value of a price or call option. This section requires previous mathematical knowledge so it may be reasonable to skip this section. It is present for readers that wish to understand the background behind the model even further.
This is the main form of the Black-Scholes equation which gives the value of a call option and the components of this will be discussed below. C is the call option price, N(d) is the cumulative distribution function of the normal distribution. S is the current price of the asset, K is the strike price (the price at which the owner of the option can buy or sell the asset). r is the risk-free interest rate and (T-t) is the time to maturity.
This is the other form of the Black-Scholes equation which gives the value of a put option, P, and all of the other values are the same as before.
The values of N(d1) and N(d2) are the cumulative distribution function of the normal distributions of d1 and d2 which are shown below.
These equations show how the d(1) and d(2) values are calculated and the values in the equations are the same as before.
Here are some quiz questions that you can use to test your understanding of the content above. Click here to test yourself!
These are resources to further your understanding of this subject, if required.
Chodos, A and Oulette J. (Feburary 2005), This month in Physics History: Einstein and Brownian Motion, Volume 14, Number 2, American Physical Society.
Ermogenous, Angeliki, Brownian Motion and Its Applications In The Stock Market (2006). Undergraduate Mathematics Day: Proceedings and Other Materials. 15.
Stewart, Ian. (February 2, 2012), 17 Equations that Changed the World, Chapter 17, The Midas Formula, Basic Books (UK/US)
Chello, A. (2020), A Gentle Introduction to Geometric Brownian Motion in Finance, The Quant Journey.
Britannica. T, Editors of encyclopaedia (2017, May 31), Physics: Brownian Motion, Encyclopaedia Britannica.
· Bachelier, Louis (1900), Théorie de la Spéculation, Annales Scientifique de l’École Normale Supérieure, 3e série, tome 17, 21-86.
Brown, Robert (1828), A Brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August 1827 on the particles contained in the pollen of plants, privately circulated.
· Einstein, Albert (1905). Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 17 (4), 549-560.
Holton, Glyn. (June 4, 2013), Brownian Motion (Wiener Process), GlynHolton.
Yang, Z. and Aldous, D., (2015), Geometric brownian motion model in financial market. University of California, Berkeley.
Completed by: Jake Wilkes, James Penston, Sam Jones and James Lundie.
© 2022 Physics in society project